
“Unexpectedly”
People are always surprised.
Chagrined.
Shocked!
To discover that paying buyers to buy backfires.
We really didn’t pay the buyers. WE PAID THE SELLERS.
We inflated values by $8000. With money we don’t have. That the Germans and Chinese have kindly loaned us. That our kids and grandchildren will pay back.
And, “unexpectedly”, sales of existing homes declined.
CNBC has details here.
“Sales of previously owned homes fell unexpectedly in May as delays in processing mortgage applications hampered the closing of contracts benefiting from a popular homebuyer tax credit, an industry group said on Tuesday.
 |
|
AP
|
The National Association of Realtors said sales fell 2.2 percent month over month to an annual rate of 5.66 million units from an upwardly revised 5.79 million-unit pace in April.
Analysts polled by Reuters expected May sales to rise 5.5 percent to a 6.12 million-unit pace from the previously reported 5.77 million units in April. Sales were up 19.2 percent compared to May last year.
Sales were expected to rise as transactions for existing homes are measured at contract closing.
Although the tax credit for home buyers expired in April, qualified home owners have until June 30 to close contracts.
“There hasn’t been much of a rebound in housing. We are growing from the extremely low levels of last year. On average, we are looking for a moderate advancing trend,” said Stephen Stanley, chief Economist at Pierpont Securities in Stamford, Connecticut.”
Shocking!
But not unexpected.
A contrarian view here:
“Things are looking worse on the housing front, with a severe drop-off in existing home sales following the expiration of the home-buyer tax credit. It’s hard to overstate how stupid this policy was. The government marketed it as a measure to boost residential real-estate prices by providing new home-buyers with a tax credit in the neighborhood of $8,000. Did you see the ubiquitous ads featuring the couple that gets an envelope full of cash from Uncle Sam? The idea was to convince potential home-buyers that they were the ones who would benefit from the subsidy, when in fact the opposite was true. The tax credit was a subsidy for sellers, not buyers, allowing them to increase their asking price (or avoid decreasing it) by $8,000.
The government’s “gift” to new home-buyers? A house immediately worth $8,000 less than they paid for it, and falling fast thanks to the sharp drop-off in demand that accompanied the expiration of the tax credit. Gee, thanks, Uncle Sam! I’m not sure the “predatory lenders” Obama likes to talk about ever did anything that sketchy.”